Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening|
|Authors:||Meslin, Eric M.;Schwartz, Peter H.|
|Keywords:||Decision Making;Humans;Informed Consent;Mass Screening;Patient Education as Topic;Patient Participation;Personal Autonomy;Primary Prevention;Risk Assessment;Risk Reduction Behavior|
|Publisher:||Journal of General Internal Medicine|
|Description:||Some experts have argued that patients should routinely be told the specific magnitude and absolute probability of potential risks and benefits of screening tests. This position is motivated by the idea that framing risk information in ways that are less precise violates the ethical principle of respect for autonomy and its application in informed consent or shared decision-making. In this Perspective, we consider a number of problems with this view that have not been adequately addressed. The most important challenges stem from the danger that patients will misunderstand the information or have irrational responses to it. Any initiative in this area should take such factors into account and should consider carefully how to apply the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence.|
|Other Identifiers:||Schwartz PH, Meslin EM. The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):867-70|
|Appears in Collections:||School of Medicine|
Files in This Item:
Click on the URI links for accessing contents.
Items in HannanDL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.